tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5303246073824127471.post1128821828389695575..comments2024-03-28T08:17:02.778-04:00Comments on Multiplication by Infinity: FROM OVER THERE TO OVER HERE: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Movement as EmergentSteven Colyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10435759210177642257noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5303246073824127471.post-78818521545033867142010-03-27T12:49:29.076-04:002010-03-27T12:49:29.076-04:00A movement-less universe could be, but it could no...A movement-less universe could <em>be</em>, but it could not <em>become</em>. Thus, it could not construct complexity and would irremediably remain simple, I mean, containing as less information as possible.<br /><br />In case one considers the Universe as being <em>everything</em> that can exist, how could then everything be the least information ever?... Sounds absurd, doesn't it?Jérôme Chauvethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02545307794681614263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5303246073824127471.post-85834822446042099192010-03-27T06:11:01.696-04:002010-03-27T06:11:01.696-04:00Yeah sure, explain it more. Write your own book. :...Yeah sure, explain it more. Write your own book. :-)<br /><br />I like your first point. It makes me wonder: what is there NOT in our universe, that we cannot describe because it's not there (but is nevertheless possible in some Universe), like a movement-less universe couldn't describe movement because it doesn't exist there? Hmm.Steven Colyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10435759210177642257noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5303246073824127471.post-13011073802908716782010-03-25T18:05:33.392-04:002010-03-25T18:05:33.392-04:00In some universe that would be without movement, y...In some universe that would be without movement, you could not write the sentence "a universe without movement", whereas in a universe equipped with movement, you can write "a universe equipped with movement", because movement is needed to write about it, which means the latter is more interesting than the former.<br /><br />This relates this theory to my own theory of universe, i.e., the theory of interestingness, which is revolutionary, and which states the more a theory is fun writing about it, the realer it is.<br /><br />Was it clear enough, or shall I explain once more?Jérôme Chauvethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02545307794681614263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5303246073824127471.post-70952122293040066012010-03-22T11:36:43.249-04:002010-03-22T11:36:43.249-04:00Oh, I'm only getting started. This will be boo...Oh, I'm only getting started. This will be book length, eventually, and thanks.Steven Colyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10435759210177642257noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5303246073824127471.post-35189972020540752192010-03-22T10:40:18.051-04:002010-03-22T10:40:18.051-04:00LoL
nice satyr!!LoL<br /><br />nice satyr!!Iolaumnoreply@blogger.com