Tuesday, March 24, 2009

8. The Pyronic Field

The Pyronic Field is where we live. It is far from the edge of the universe, so questions regarding The Pyronic Edge are moot, as any "pyronic energy" transferred from or to a pyron will be to or from another adjacent pyron, and not possibly create a new one, as it would have to if it was The Original Pyron with its Fundamental Anthropic Energy, or the Edge Pyrons, which are constantly creating new Pyrons as well as bouncing MatterWaves that reach the Edge back into the Universe.

We are moving rapidly through this field, which is static.

Energy is defined as massless bundled up waves.

Matter is defined as bundled up waves with mass.

What we call "quanta," i.e., particles, are therefore defined as a concentration of pyrons rapidly gaining or losing "on/off" energy states, thus giving the illusion of particles.

Think of the pyronic field as being the blackboard upon which all energy and mass are written, and you will be well on your way to understanding this theory, and hopefully coming up with experiments to either prove or disprove it.

A good analogy would be the screen at a cinema. The film is projected onto the screen. The screen is the pyronic field, and each timestep of 3-D space is one frame of the film.

With these few assumptions, and based on experiments to date and other theories, we first hope to show the exact dimensions and structures of photons, gluons, neutrinos, quarks, and electrons.

I am indebted to Louis-Victor-Pierre-Raymond, 7th duc de Broglie (1892-1987), better known as Louis de Broglie, whose seminal 1924 paper first positing the wave nature of matter got me thinking of this subject in the first place.

Monday, March 23, 2009

7. The Tessellation Problem

Congrats to those who figured out "The Tessellation Problem" before reading the following:

A pyramid can tile, or "tessellate" a 2-D space, as can a square. A circle or oval cannot.

A pyronic tetrahedron on the other hand, cannot tessellate a 3-D space, but a cube can, and a sphere most certainly cannot.

Is this then, a problem?

At first I thought so, then I realized this:

The "out" is that two tetrahedrons and one octahedron can tessellate 3-D space. All three would then constitute a rhomboid, of which a cube is a special case (all right angles and vertices of equal length). And once again, the number "three" shows itself in Physics.

Can "The Old One" as Einstein called him settle for such a situation, especially if He uses Occam's razor?

Perhaps, and here's why:

With Pyrons alone, I could figure out what alleged "point particles" (they're not points) photons, electrons, quarks, and neutrinos look like, but not gluons, and those are the 5 things that make up 99.9+ percent of our Universe, and each of us.

But having TWO basic shapes would solve the gluon problem, and chirality too.

Friday, March 20, 2009

6. The Pyronic Edge

The Pyronic Edge is the edge of the Universe. It's out there, it's roughly spherical, it is expanding.

At t=timestep 0 (the moment of creation), the initial pyron was the only thing in the Universe, and "the edge" were its four faces.

Ar t=timestep 1, there were 5 pyrons, and the edge (and Universe) was quite tetrahedral. Beginning at t=timestep 2, the pyramidal structure changes from tetrahedron to "toward spherical."

The vast majority of this website will be devoted to what goes on between The Original Pyron and The Pyronic Edge. To whit: The Pyronic Field.

However, the edge is important, because that is where new waves (which eventually become particles) are freshly created, in addition to those wave particles that previous edges have made to exist.

As far as "what lies beyond the edge" or "what are pyrons expanding INto", that is not the purpose of this theory.

This theory will constrict itself, for now, to the Universe we live in.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

5. The Original Pyron

The original atom of space, and all pyrons for that matter, are roughly 1.6 times ten to the minus-35th power meters (the Planck length) across, based on what the Loop Quantum Gravitationists say.

The original one had the following three properties:

1) It was (and still is) homogeneous. Simplicity demands it. Mandelbrot (Chaos Theory) and Wolfram (cellular automata) will explain what happens next.
2) It radiated, in the first atomic time step (from Loop Quantum Gravity: 10 to the minus 23 seconds) from its 4 faces, thus creating 4 more adjacent pyrons (faces meeting) at t = t-one step. The process continues with them as well at t=timestep number two, t=timestep number three, ... , t=timestep number infinity
3) It had an initial, specific anthropic energy. If the energy value (a single number) weren't exactly what it was, we wouldn't be here to consider it.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

4. The Three Branches of Pyronics

Incidentally I will never publish here until I have had a month to quintuple-check my mathematics and ask an outsider to confirm and agree with my positions. This means my progress will always be on the order of a month ahead of this website. Yes, I do this for reputation reasons, sure, but primarily because I wish to be correct.

The Three Banches of Pyronics are:

1) The Original Pyron
- At issue: what was its original energy? Strange that but beautifully simple if the "initial conditions" of the Universe could be reduced to a single number.

2) The Pyronic Field
- I know this will be where most of the work will be done, because we live in it. No, it is not the "ether," although I sadly predict that the less-than-fully-informed will accuse it of being such.

3) The Edge of the Universe
- Just as the Universe began in the first "time moment" (a single pyron), then advanced to time moment #2 (by the orginal creating 4 more pyrons at each of its faces, and so on), so does this process continue (and has always continued) at the Universe's very edge. I will not concern myself with what lies beyound "Space," as our lives and my interest will be what lies within it.

Philosphers may note that one possibility it that we are the bud of another massively larger Universe, and that we live at the very center of a black hole in such a Universe. I will not concern myself with Philosphers or Philosophy at this early stage.