Mathematician Barry Mazur authored a book entitled * Imagining Numbers: (particularly the square root of minus fifteen)* (ISBN 0-374-17469-5) . Farrar, Straus and Giroux published the book in 2003. A purpose of the book, apparently, is to show that mathematics in human society is durative by nature.

In the preface, Mazur describes the target audience of the book as follows.

*This book...is written for people who have no training in mathematics and who may not have actively thought about mathematics since high school, or even during it, but who may wish to experience an act of mathematical imagining and to consider how such an experience compares with the imaginative work involved in reading and understanding a phrase in a poem.*

In the conclusion, Mazur provides a window onto the value of mathematics for human endeavour:

The number

i= √-1 is identified with the point whose coordinates are (0,1); that is, with the point 1 unit north of the origin. Recall that we chose to view "multiplication by √-1" as a rotation by 90 degreescounterclockwiseabout the origin. A good test of whether we have understood this passage from complex numbers to points on the plane is to ask ourselves what would be different if we had identified "multiplication by √-1" as a rotation of the plane 90 degreesclockwise; or, what would be the same, 270 degrees counterclockwise? The brief answer here is that nothing whatsoever would change, except for the curious fact thatiwould be playing the role that -iplays in our identification, -iwould be playing the role thatiplays, and more generally, the complex numbera-biwould be playing the role thata+biplays. Behind this lies a surprise, anda curious mirror. There is no intrinsic (algebraic) way of distinguishing +√-1 from -√-1. Each of them, of course, is a square root of -1. The only distinction between them is given by their names, and our choosing to put +inorth of the origin and -isouth of it. We could have reversed our choice, provided we kept track of that, and worked consistently with this other choice. These entities, +iand -i, are twins, and the only breaking of their symmetry comes from the way in which wenamethem. Imagine the analogous moment when parents of newly born identical twins choose names for their two children, thereby making the first, and immensely important, distinction between them. A reader of an early draft of this book asked why I called +iand -itwins, but did not, for example, call +1 and -1 twins. Here is why. The number +1 is distinguished from the number -1 by some purely algebraic property (for example, it is equal to its square), while there is no analogous property, described entirely in terms of addition and multiplication, that distinguishes +ifrom -iand yet does not, either directly or indirectly, make use of the names we gave to them. The complex numbersa+bianda-biare calledconjugates. And the act of "conjugation"—that is, passing from a complex number to its conjugate (or equivalently, reversing the sign of the imaginary part of a complex number)—is a basicsymmetryof the complex number system. There are other number systems that admit a bewildering collection of symmetries, of internal mirrors. One of the great challenges to modern algebra is to understand, and use, these internal mirrors.

Barry Mazur, *Imagining Numbers (Particularly the Square Root of Minus Fifteen)*, Chapter 12, pp215-7

## 1 comment:

Nice piece on "a Curious Mirror". Keep up the thought provoking work!

Post a Comment