I should very much like to have this resolved as I cannot locate the paper myself after half an hour of searching.
A link would be most appreciated, so that we can put this to rest and I can then delete this post. Here is the e-mail:
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Garrett Lisi in Real Time":
is deleting requests for Garrett Lisi to provide a full reference for the paper he claims he published in a peer-reviewed journal. I can find no such paper.
If you do not believe me, please search Garrett's claimed article for yourself:
And you will find: "Your search - Garrett Lisi - did not match any articles published in J Phys A Math Theor 43."
"Your search - Lisi - did not match any articles published in J Phys A Math Theor.""
You can see more here, where Peter deleted a ton of my posts for asking simple questions: http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=3292&cpage=2#comment-70663
Yes--at Peter Woit's blog, Garrett claims that a peer-reviewed paper exists.
When commenters questioned its reality, Peter Woit snapped: "
Peter Woit says: November 26, 2010 at 12:06 pm
I’ve had to delete repeated anonymous comments by someone who couldn’t be bothered to either look things up for himself or read Garrett’s previous response to the same question:
At Peter Woit's blog, Garret writes, "
No, but it’s wrong. The paper with Lee and Simone lays out 90% of the theory, and was published in J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010). Lee and I tend to just put papers on the arxiv, but Simone thought it would be good to put it in a journal. There was no problem getting it published."
But then we go to Garrett's wikipedia page which he is known to self-edit, and there is no mention of any such paper.
There is no mention of any paper with Simone, nor the J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010).
Why is there no mention of the supposed journal paper that was peer-reviewed which Lisi states he coauthored? Is Lisi lying about the existence of such a peer-reviewed paper?
In addition, there is no mention of Simone on the page.